An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Standard

An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation : Some factors that may influence the outcome. / Hagelin, Joakim; Carlsson, Hans Erik; Hau, Jann.

In: Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 67-81.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hagelin, J, Carlsson, HE & Hau, J 2003, 'An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome', Public Understanding of Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012001247

APA

Hagelin, J., Carlsson, H. E., & Hau, J. (2003). An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012001247

Vancouver

Hagelin J, Carlsson HE, Hau J. An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome. Public Understanding of Science. 2003 Jan;12(1):67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012001247

Author

Hagelin, Joakim ; Carlsson, Hans Erik ; Hau, Jann. / An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation : Some factors that may influence the outcome. In: Public Understanding of Science. 2003 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 67-81.

Bibtex

@article{bb2fd6b9a7f645d3b858ac51c1fa9270,
title = "An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome",
abstract = "Many factors may influence the outcome of surveys on how people view the use of animals in research. Some aspects are related to the instrument used, whereas others are related to the characteristics of the respondents. Conducted in Western countries, the study is primarily a review of 56 surveys targeting scientists, students, and the public. Surveys were obtained from searching online databases and reference lists, or directly from authors whose surveys were not otherwise available. Factors related to the instrument listed include the questionnaire used and wording of questions. Factors related to the respondent include age, gender, upbringing, religion, knowledge, education, and practical experience. Results demonstrate that there was great discrepancy in acceptance/opposition estimations reported in different surveys. It is concluded that interpretation and comparison of results from different surveys should be made with caution.",
author = "Joakim Hagelin and Carlsson, {Hans Erik} and Jann Hau",
year = "2003",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1177/0963662503012001247",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "67--81",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation

T2 - Some factors that may influence the outcome

AU - Hagelin, Joakim

AU - Carlsson, Hans Erik

AU - Hau, Jann

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - Many factors may influence the outcome of surveys on how people view the use of animals in research. Some aspects are related to the instrument used, whereas others are related to the characteristics of the respondents. Conducted in Western countries, the study is primarily a review of 56 surveys targeting scientists, students, and the public. Surveys were obtained from searching online databases and reference lists, or directly from authors whose surveys were not otherwise available. Factors related to the instrument listed include the questionnaire used and wording of questions. Factors related to the respondent include age, gender, upbringing, religion, knowledge, education, and practical experience. Results demonstrate that there was great discrepancy in acceptance/opposition estimations reported in different surveys. It is concluded that interpretation and comparison of results from different surveys should be made with caution.

AB - Many factors may influence the outcome of surveys on how people view the use of animals in research. Some aspects are related to the instrument used, whereas others are related to the characteristics of the respondents. Conducted in Western countries, the study is primarily a review of 56 surveys targeting scientists, students, and the public. Surveys were obtained from searching online databases and reference lists, or directly from authors whose surveys were not otherwise available. Factors related to the instrument listed include the questionnaire used and wording of questions. Factors related to the respondent include age, gender, upbringing, religion, knowledge, education, and practical experience. Results demonstrate that there was great discrepancy in acceptance/opposition estimations reported in different surveys. It is concluded that interpretation and comparison of results from different surveys should be made with caution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041877374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0963662503012001247

DO - 10.1177/0963662503012001247

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:0041877374

VL - 12

SP - 67

EP - 81

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 369368363