Rethinking data treatment: The sucrose preference threshold for anhedonia in stress-induced rat models of depression
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Rethinking data treatment : The sucrose preference threshold for anhedonia in stress-induced rat models of depression. / Berrio, Jenny P.; Kalliokoski, Otto.
In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 395, 109910, 2023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking data treatment
T2 - The sucrose preference threshold for anhedonia in stress-induced rat models of depression
AU - Berrio, Jenny P.
AU - Kalliokoski, Otto
N1 - Funding Information: This research received funding from the Danish 3R Center [grant number 33010-NIFA-20-743 ].
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Exposing rats to repeated unpredictable stressors is a popular method for modelling depression. The sucrose preference test is used to assess the validity of this method, as it measures a rat´s preference for a sweet solution as an indicator of its ability to experience pleasure. Typically, if stressed rats show a lower preference compared to unstressed rats, it is concluded they are experiencing stress-induced anhedonia. Methods: While conducting a systematic review, we identified 18 studies that used thresholds to define anhedonia and to distinguish “susceptible” from “resilient” individuals. Based on their definitions, researchers either excluded “resilient” animals from further analyses or treated them as a separate cohort. We performed a descriptive analysis to understand the rationale behind these criteria. Results: we found that the methods used for characterizing the stressed rats were largely unsupported. Many authors failed to justify their choices or relied exclusively on referencing previous studies. When tracing back the method to its origins, we converged on a pioneering article that, although employed as a universal evidence-based justification, cannot be regarded as such. What is more, through a simulation study, we provided evidence that removing or splitting data, based on an arbitrary threshold, introduces statistical bias by overestimating the effect of stress. Conclusion: Caution must be exercised when implementing a predefined cut-off for anhedonia. Researchers should be aware of potential biases introduced by their data treatment strategies and strive for transparent reporting of methodological decisions.
AB - Background: Exposing rats to repeated unpredictable stressors is a popular method for modelling depression. The sucrose preference test is used to assess the validity of this method, as it measures a rat´s preference for a sweet solution as an indicator of its ability to experience pleasure. Typically, if stressed rats show a lower preference compared to unstressed rats, it is concluded they are experiencing stress-induced anhedonia. Methods: While conducting a systematic review, we identified 18 studies that used thresholds to define anhedonia and to distinguish “susceptible” from “resilient” individuals. Based on their definitions, researchers either excluded “resilient” animals from further analyses or treated them as a separate cohort. We performed a descriptive analysis to understand the rationale behind these criteria. Results: we found that the methods used for characterizing the stressed rats were largely unsupported. Many authors failed to justify their choices or relied exclusively on referencing previous studies. When tracing back the method to its origins, we converged on a pioneering article that, although employed as a universal evidence-based justification, cannot be regarded as such. What is more, through a simulation study, we provided evidence that removing or splitting data, based on an arbitrary threshold, introduces statistical bias by overestimating the effect of stress. Conclusion: Caution must be exercised when implementing a predefined cut-off for anhedonia. Researchers should be aware of potential biases introduced by their data treatment strategies and strive for transparent reporting of methodological decisions.
KW - Anhedonia
KW - Chronic unpredictable stress
KW - Data treatment
KW - Statistical bias
KW - Stress susceptibility
KW - Sucrose preference test
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109910
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109910
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37394102
AN - SCOPUS:85165102166
VL - 395
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
SN - 0165-0270
M1 - 109910
ER -
ID: 360595331